Mark 16:10

10	ἐκείνη πορευθεῖσα ἀπήγγειλεν τοῖς μετ´ αὐτοῦ γενομένοις πενθοῦσι καὶ κλαίουσιν· Nestle-Aland 28th
	And she went and told them that had been with him, as they mourned and wept. (KJV)

#	Greek	MAC & POS	Definition
1565	ἐκεῖνος, η, ο	D-NSF	that one (or neut. that thing), often intensified by the article preceding
4198	πορεύομαι	V-AOP-NSF	to go
518	ἀπαγγέλλω	V-AAI-3S	to report, announce
3588	ὁ, ἡ, τό	T-DPM	the
3326	μετά	PREP	with, among, after
846	αὐτός, αὐτή, αὐτό	P-GSM	(1) self (emphatic) (2) he, she, it (used for the third person pronoun) (3) the same
1096	γίνομαι	V-2ADP-DPM	to come into being, to happen, to become
3996	πενθέω	V-PAP-DPM	to mourn, lament
2532	καί	CONJ	and, even, also
2799	κλαίω	V-PAP-DPM	to weep

version	verse
Berean Greek NT 2016	ἐκείνη πορευθεῖσα ἀπήγγειλεν τοῖς μετ’ αὐτοῦ γενομένοις πενθοῦσι καὶ κλαίουσιν·
SBL Greek NT 2010	ἐκείνη πορευθεῖσα ἀπήγγειλεν τοῖς μετ’ αὐτοῦ γενομένοις πενθοῦσι καὶ κλαίουσιν·
Nestle Greek NT 1904	ἐκείνη πορευθεῖσα ἀπήγγειλεν τοῖς μετ’ αὐτοῦ γενομένοις πενθοῦσι καὶ κλαίουσιν·
Westcott & Hort 1881	ἐκείνη πορευθεῖσα ἀπήγγειλεν τοῖς μετ´ αὐτοῦ γενομένοις πενθοῦσι καὶ κλαίουσιν·
Nestle-Aland 27th	ἐκείνη πορευθεῖσα ἀπήγγειλεν τοῖς μετ´ αὐτοῦ γενομένοις πενθοῦσι καὶ κλαίουσιν·
Nestle-Aland 28th	ἐκείνη πορευθεῖσα ἀπήγγειλεν τοῖς μετ´ αὐτοῦ γενομένοις πενθοῦσι καὶ κλαίουσιν·
RP Byzantine Majority Text 2005	Ἐκείνη πορευθεῖσα ἀπήγγειλεν τοῖς μετ’ αὐτοῦ γενομένοις, πενθοῦσιν καὶ κλαίουσιν.
Greek Orthodox Church 1904	ἐκείνη πορευθεῖσα ἀπήγγειλε τοῖς μετ’ αὐτοῦ γενομένοις, πενθοῦσι καὶ κλαίουσι.
Tiechendorf 8th Edition 1872	ἐκείνη πορευθεῖσα ἀπήγγειλεν τοῖς μετ´ αὐτοῦ γενομένοις, πενθοῦσιν καὶ κλαίουσιν.
Scrivener's Textus Receptus 1894	ἐκείνη πορευθεῖσα ἀπήγγειλε τοῖς μετ’ αὐτοῦ γενομένοις, πενθοῦσι καὶ κλαίουσι.
Sthephanus Textus Receptus 1550	ἐκείνη πορευθεῖσα ἀπήγγειλεν τοῖς μετ´ αὐτοῦ γενομένοις πενθοῦσιν καὶ κλαίουσιν·
Beza Greek NT 1598	Ἐκείνη πορευθεῖσα ἀπήγγειλε τοῖς μετ᾽ αὐτοῦ γενομένοις, πενθοῦσι καὶ κλαίουσι.

Mark 16:10 [Textus Receptus (Elzevir) (1624)]185
Ἐκείνη πορευθεῖσα ἀπήγγειλε τοῖς μετ’ αὐτοῦ γενομένοις, πενθοῦσι καὶ κλαίουσι.

MSS: Y, Ω, 1※, 22※ (f107r), 438, 439, 1582※ (f133v), ℓ339 (f25rc2)

Mark 16:10 [Codex Alexandrinus (A02) (5th century)]18rc2
εκεινη πορευθεισα απηγγειλεν τοις μετ αυτου γενομενοις πενθουσιν και κλαιουσιν·

MSS: A, L (f113vc1)

Mark 16:10 [Codex Vaticanus Gr. 1209 (B03) (4th century)]37ac2
OMITTED

Mark 16:10 [Codex Ephraemi Syri Rescriptus (C04) (5th century)]84
Εκεινη .. πορευθεισα απηγγειλεν τοις μετ αυτου γενομενοις πενθουσι και κλαιουσιν·

Mark 16:10 [Codex Bezae Cantabrigiensis (D05) (5th century)]347v|675
Εκεινη πορευθεισα· απηγγειλεν αυτοις τοις μετ αυτου γενομενοις πενθουσι και κλαιουσι

#	Manucript	Date	Location
1	GA_032	4th–5th Century	Smithsonian Institution, Freer Gallery of Art, Washington D.C.
2	GA_02	5th Century	London, British Library
3	GA_05	5th Century	Cambridge, University Library
4	GA_019	8th Century	Paris, France, Bibliotheque Nationale
5	GA_Lect_844	9th Century	Sinai, St. Catherine's Monastery
6	GA_021	9th Century	Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris
7	GA_034	9th Century	Cambridge, England, University Library
8	GA_037	9th Century	Abbey Library of St. Gallen, Switzerland
9	GA_038_digital	9th Century	Tbilisi, National Centre of Manuscripts
10	GA_045	9th Century	Athos, Greece, Dionysiou Monastery
11	GA_1424	9th–10th Century	Kosinitza Monastery, Drama, Greece (Formerly: Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago)
12	GA_Lect_17	9th Century	Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale
13	GA_Lect_1533	9th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
14	GA_044	9th–10th Century	Athos, Lavra
15	GA_Lect_34	9th Century	Munich, Germany, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
16	GA_Lect_425	9th-10th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
17	GA_0211	9th Century	Tbilisi, National Centre of Manuscripts
18	GA_017	9th Century	Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale
19	GA_033	10th Century	University Library of Ludwig-Maximilians: University of Munich, Germany
20	GA_1346	10th-11th Century	Jerusalem, Orthodox Patriarchate
21	GA_2414	10th Century	Zagora, Greece, Public Historical Library of Zagora
22	GA_669	10th Century	Dumbarton Oaks Museum, Washington DC
23	GA_773	10th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
24	GA_2907	10th Century	UK, private collection
25	GA_652	10th Century	Munich, Germany, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
26	GA_34	10th Century	Paris, France, Bibliothèque Nationale
27	GA_1701	10th Century	New Haven, Connecticut, Yale University Library
28	GA_1417	10th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
29	GA_106	11th–12th Century	Chester Beatty Library, Dublin
30	GA_124	11th Century	Austrian National Library, Vienna
31	GA_Lect_20	11th Century	Oxford, United Kingdom, Bodleian Library
32	GA_230	11th Century	The Royal Library of El Escorial, Escorial
33	GA_2370	11th Century	Walters Art Museum, Baltimore, Maryland
34	GA_2437	11th-12th Century	Rio de Janeiro, Biblioteca Nacional
35	GA_473_Lambeth22	11th Century	London, United Kingdom, Lambeth Palace Library
36	GA_700	11th Century	London, UK, British Library
37	GA_785	11th-12th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
38	GA_8	11th Century	Paris, France, Bibliothèque Nationale
39	GA_804	11th Century	Hellenic Parliament Library, Athens
40	GA_796	11th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
41	GA_788	11th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
42	GA_43	11th Century	Paris, France, Bibliothèque de l´Arsenal
43	GA_2	11th-12th Century	Basel, University Library
44	GA_2097x	11th Century	Hellenic Parliament Library, Athens
45	GA_1691	11th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
46	GA_1545	11th Century	Athos, Vatopediu
47	GA_1413	11th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
48	GA_1317	11th Century	Jerusalem, Orthodox Patriarchate
49	GA_Lect_60	11th Century	Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale
50	noGA_NLG_118	11th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
51	GA_Lect_434	12th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
52	GA_Lect_1965	12th Century	David M. Rubenstein Rare Book and Manuscripts Library, Duke, Durham, North Carolina
53	GA_2358_updated	12th Century	James P. Boyce Centennial Library at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Louisville, Kentucky
54	GA_Lect_1625	12th Century	Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago, Gruber Collection
55	GA_346_KC	12th Century	Milano, Biblioteca Ambrosiana
56	GA_57	12th Century	Oxford, United Kingdom, Magdalen College Library
57	GA_662	12th Century	Melbourne, Australia; National Gallery of Victoria
58	GA_897	12th Century	University of Edinburgh
59	GA_787	12th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
60	GA_782	12th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
61	GA_779	12th-13th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
62	GA_778	12th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
63	GA_777	12th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
64	GA_760	12th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
65	GA_543	12th Century	University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
66	GA_750	12th Century	Paris, France, Bibliothèque Nationale
67	GA_1	12th Century	Basel, University Library
68	GA_1692	12th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
69	GA_1418	12th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
70	GA_1416	12th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
71	GA_1415	12th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
72	GA_1316	12th Century	Jerusalem, Orthodox Patriarchate
73	GA_1689_Prague	13th Century	Prague, Czech Republic, Academy of Sciences Library
74	GA_1780	13th Century	David M. Rubenstein Rare Book & Manuscript Library, Duke University, Durham, NC
75	GA_Lect_1683	13th Century	INTF, Muenster, Germany
76	GA_2371	13th Century	Baltimore, Walters Art Museum
77	GA_Lect_1616	13th Century	University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
78	GA_2444	13th Century	Muenster, Instituts für Neutestamentliche Textforschung (INTF)
79	GA_5	13th Century	Paris, France, Bibliothèque Nationale
80	GA_775	13th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
81	GA_759	13th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
82	GA_757	13th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
83	GA_544	13th Century	University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
84	GA_2374_Walters	13th-14th Century	Baltimore, Maryland, Walters Art Museum
85	GA_427	13th Century	Munich, Germany, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek
86	GA_260_BNF	13th Century	Paris, France, Bibliothèque Nationale
87	GA_Lect_1684	13th Century	Bible Museum, Münster
88	GA_1697	13th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
89	GA_1690	13th-14th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
90	GA_13	13th Century	Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale
91	noGA_NLG_4074	13th-14th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
92	GA_Lect_1578	14th Century	University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
93	GA_811	14th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
94	GA_789	14th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
95	GA_764	14th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
96	GA_761	14th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
97	GA_762	14th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
98	GA_758	14th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens
99	GA_Lect_118	14th Century	Florence, Italy, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana
100	GA_1354	14th Century	Jerusalem, Orthodox Patriarchate
101	GA_12	14th Century	Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale
102	GA_1592	15th Century	Athos, Vatopediu
103	GA_69	15th Century	Leicester, Leicestershire [England] Record Office
104	GA_1686	15th Century	National Library of Greece, Athens

(1) Mark 16:10 : A, D, E, G, K, L, M, S, Y, Δ, Ω, 1※, 13, 22※, 438, 439, 700, 892, 1582※, ℓ339, ℓ1086 (ii), Majority
(2) OMIT Mark 16:10 : א, B, 1*, 1582*

(3) πορευθεισα : A, C, D, E, G, L, M, S, Y, Ω, 1※, 22※, 438, 439, 700, 1582※, ℓ339, Majority
(4) πορευθισα : Δ
(5) πορευθησα : 13, ℓ1086 (ii)
(6) απελθουσα : K, 892

(7) απηγγειλε : M, Y, Ω, 1※, 13, 22※, 438, 439, 700, 892, 1582※, ℓ339, ℓ1086 (ii), Majority
(8) απηγγειλεν : A, C, E, G, K, L, S, Δ
(9) απηγγειλεν αυτοις : D

(10) πενθουσι : C, D, E, K, M, S, Y, Ω, 1※, 22※, 438, 439, 700, 892, 1582※, ℓ339, ℓ1086 (ii)
(11) πενθουσιν : A, G, L, Δ, 13

(12) κλαιουσι : D, M, S, Y, Ω, 1※, 22※, 438, 439, 892, 1582※, ℓ339, ℓ1086 (ii)
(13) κλαιουσιν : A, C, E, G, K, L, Δ, 13, 22※?, 700

C (84), G (f115rc2), M (f132rc1)

(a) It is only since the appearance of Griesbach’s second edi tion [1796–1806] that Critics of the New Testament have permitted themselves to handle the last twelve verses of S. Mark’s Gospel with disrespect. Previous critical editions of the New Testament are free from this reproach. “ There is no reason for doubting the genuineness of this portion of Scripture , ” wrote Mill in 1707 , after a review of the evidence (as far as he was acquainted with it ) for and against . Twenty-seven years later, appeared Bengel’s edition of the New Testament ( 1734 ) ; and Wetstein , at the end of another seventeen years (1751-2), followed in the same field . Both editors , after rehearsing the adverse testimony in extenso, left the passage in undisputed possession of its place. Alter in 1786-7 , and Birch in 1788a , ( suspicious as the latter evi dently was of its genuineness,) followed their predecessors ‘ example . But Matthaei , ( who also brought his labours to a close in the year 1788 , ) was not content to give a silent suffrage . He had been for upwards of fourteen years a la borious collator of Greek MSS . of the New Testament , and was so convinced of the insufficiency of the arguments which had been brought against these twelve verses of S. Mark, that with no ordinary warmth , no common acuteness , he insisted on their genuineness . “ With Griesbach , ” (remarks Dr. Tregelles b,) ” Texts which may be called really critical begin ; ” and Griesbach is the first to insist that the concluding verses of S. Mark are spurious . That he did not suppose the second Gospel to have always ended at verse 8 , we have seen already ‘ . He was of opinion, however, that “ at some very remote period , the original ending of the Gospel perished, —disappeared perhaps from the Evangelist’s own copy , —and that the present ending was by some one substituted in its place . ” Griesbach further in vented the following elaborate and extraordinary hypothesis to account for the existence of S. Mark xvi . 9–20 . He invites his readers to believe that when , ( before the end of the second century , ) the four Evangelical narratives were collected into a volume and dignified with the title of “ The Gospel, ” — S. Mark’s narrative was furnished by some unknown individual with its actual termination in order to remedy its manifest incompleteness ; and that this volume became the standard of the Alexandrine recension of the text : in other words , became the fontal source of a mighty family of MSS . by Griesbach designated as “ Alexandrine. “But there will have been here and there in existence isolated copies of one or more of the Gospels ; and in all of these, S. Mark’s Gospel, ( by the hypothesis , ) will have ended abruptly at the eighth verse. These copies of single Gos pels , when collected together , are presumed by Griesbach to have constituted “ the Western recension . ” If , in codices of this family also , the self – same termination is now all but universally found , the fact is to be accounted for, (Griesbach says,) by the natural desire which possessors of the Gospels will have experienced to supplement their imperfect copies as best they might. “Let this conjecture be accepted,” proceeds the learned veteran , – (unconscious apparently that he has been demanding acceptance for at least half – a – dozen wholly unsupported as well as entirely gratui tous conjectures,) — ” and every difficulty disappears; and it becomes perfectly intelligible how there has crept into almost every codex which has been written, from the second century downwards , a section quite different from the ori . ginal and genuine ending of S. Mark, which disappeared before the four Gospels were collected into a single volume.” -In other words, if men will but be so accommodating as to assume that the conclusion of S. Mark’s Gospel disap peared before any one had the opportunity of transcribing the Evangelist’s inspired autograph , they will have no difficulty in understanding that the present conclusion of S. Mark’s Gospel was not really written by S. Mark . It should perhaps be stated in passing , that Griesbach was driven into this curious maze of unsupported conjecture by the exigencies of his ” Recension Theory ; ” which, inas much as it has been long since exploded , need not now occupy us . But it is worth observing that the argument already exhibited, (such as it is,) breaks down under the weight of the very first fact which its learned author is obliged to lay upon it. Codex B., — the solitary manuscript witness for omitting the clause in question , ( for Codex g had not yet been discovered , had been already claimed by Griesbach as a chief exponent of his so-called “Alexandrine Recension.” But then, on the Critic’s own hypothesis, (as we have seen already, ) Codex B. ought, on the contrary, to have contained it. How was that inconvenient fact to be got over? Griesbach quietly remarks in a foot – note that Codex B. “ has affinity with the Eastern family of MSS.” — The misfortune of being saddled with a worthless theory was surely never more apparent. By the time we have reached this point in the investigation , we are reminded of nothing so much as of the weary traveller who, having patiently pursued an ignis fatuus through half the night, beholds it at last vanish ; but not until it has conducted him up to his chin in the mire. Neither Hug, nor Scholz his pupil, —who in 1808 and 1830 respectively followed Griesbach with modifications of his recension – theory, — concurred in the unfavourable sen tence which their illustrious predecessor had passed on the concluding portion of S. Mark’s Gospel . The latter even eagerly vindicated its genuineness d . But with Lachmann, – whose unsatisfactory text of the Gospels appeared in 1842, – originated a new principle of Textual Revision ; the principle, namely, of paying exclusive and absolute deference to the testimony of a few arbitrarily selected ancient documents ; no regard being paid to others of the same or of yet higher antiquity. This is not the right place for discussing this plausible and certainly most convenient scheme of textual revision. That it leads to conclusions little short of irrational, is certain. I notice it only because it supplies the clue to the result which , as far as S. Mark xvi. 9-20 is concerned, has been since arrived at by Dr. Tischendorf, Dr. Tregelles, and Dean Alford, the three latest critics who have formally undertaken to reconstruct the sacred Text.

a Quatuor Evangelia Graece cum variantibus a textu lectionibus Codd. MSS . Bibliothecae Vaticanae, etc. Jussu et sumtibus regiis edidit Andreas Birch, Havniae, 1788. A copy of this very rare and sumptuous folio may be seen in the King’s Library (Brit. Mus.)

b Account of the Printed Text, p. 83.

(John W. Burgon, The Last Twelve Versesof the Gospel According to S. Mark, pp. 5-8)

Chapters
1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
11	12	13	14	15	16

Verses
1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18	19	20

ἐκείνη πορευθεῖσα ἀπήγγειλεν τοῖς μετ´ αὐτοῦ γενομένοις πενθοῦσι καὶ κλαίουσιν·

New Testament See Old Testament

Old Testament See New Testament