1 Pet 2:2 [Textus Receptus (Elzevir) (1624)]771
Ὡς ἀρτιγέννητα βρέφη, τὸ λογικὸν ἄδολον γάλα ἐπιποθήσατε, ἵνα ἐν αὐτῷ αὐξηθῆτε·MSS: 9101 Pet 2:2 [Codex Sinaiticus (א or 01) (4th century)]1 Pet 2:2 [Codex Alexandrinus (Royal MS 1 D VIII) (A02) (5th century)]1 Pet 2:2 [Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209 (B03) (4th century)]101ac2
ως αρτιγεννητα βρεφη το λογικον αδολον γαλα επιποθησατε ϊνα εν αυτω αυξηθητε εις σωτηριαν1 Pet 2:2 [Codex Ephraemi Syri Rescriptus (C04) (5th century)]
#
Manucript
Date
Location
View
1
GA_P125
3rd–4th Century
Oxford, Ashmolean Museum
2
GA_01
4th Century
London, British Library
3
GA_1424
9th–10th Century
Kosinitza Monastery, Drama, Greece (Formerly: Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago)
4
GA_1828
11th Century
National Library of Greece, Athens
5
GA_1
12th Century
Basel, University Library
6
GA_757
13th Century
National Library of Greece, Athens
7
GA_1761
14th Century
National Library of Greece, Athens
8
GA_69
15th Century
Leicester, Leicestershire [England] Record Office
9
GA_1405
15th Century
National Library of Greece, Athens
(1) αυξηθητε : 910
(2) ADD εις σωτηριαν : B
(a) The copies of greatest authority have long read, εἰς σωτηρίαν : in the more recent ones, an hiatus has been introduced, the eye of one or two copyists having glided from εἰς to εἴπερ in the next verse. (Johann Albrecht Bengel, Gnomon 5, p53)(b) “In many MSS., Versions, and Fathers is added εἰς σωτηρίαν ; which reading is adopted by almost all recent Critics. Yet, though it is well supported, I cannot but suspect it (with Mill and Wolf) to be a gloss ; since for its omission in so many MSS. no reason can be imagined; but its addition is easily accounted for. Wolf moreover thinks, that, had the Apostle chose to add any thing further, he would have written εἰς ἄνδρα τέλειον ; as Eph. 4.13.” (S. T. Bloomfield, Recensio Synoptica Annotationis Sacrae Being A Critical Digest & Synoptical Arrangement Of The Annotations On The New Testament – Vol. 8, 1828, p. 650-651)(c) “The words εἰς σωτηρίαν are undoubtedly genuine; see Tischendorf’s note.” (Charles Bigg, A Critical & Exegetical Commentary On The Epistles Of St Peter & St Jude, 1905, p. 126)